4.7 Article

Determination of perfluorinated compounds in environmental water samples by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry using surfactant-coated Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles as adsorbents

Journal

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages 207-214

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2011.01.011

Keywords

Perfluorinated compounds; Magnetic nanosized adsorbent; Solid-phase extraction; Environmental water samples

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21007063, 20921063, 20975110]
  2. National Basic Research Program (973) of China [2008CB418200]
  3. State High Technology Development Plan [2007AA06Z405]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel method was developed for solid-phase extraction (SPE) of perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) from environmental water samples using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles (Fe3O4 NPs) as an adsorbent. The magnetic nanosized adsorbent has a large surface area and superparamagnetic properties. This gives it a high extraction capacity and allows for convenient isolation by a magnetic field. Compared with other SPE methods and our previous work on PFCs, this method exhibited a fairly good analytical performance and required a small amount of sorbent (50 mg) and short pretreatment times (30 min) for 800 mL environmental water samples. Seven PFCs, including perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUnDA), perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoDA), and perfluorotetradecanoic acid (PFTA), extracted by the optimized method were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/ESI-MS/MS). A concentration factor of 1600 was achieved when extracting 800 mL of several environmental water samples. Detection limits obtained for PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, PFDA, PFUnDA, PFDoDA and PFTA were 0.14, 0.022, 0.31, 0.23, 0.11, 0.16, 0.091 ng/L, respectively. The relative standard deviations of recoveries ranged from 1 to 8%, indicating good method precision. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available