4.7 Article

A seasonal study of atmospheric conditions influenced by the intensive tourist flow in the Royal Museum of Wawel Castle in Cracow, Poland

Journal

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages 99-106

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2008.04.005

Keywords

Mass tourism; Preventive conservation; Suspended particulate matter; EPMA; EDXRF; Microclimate; TSP

Funding

  1. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA) [F67647,]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing mass tourism can generate important microclimatic perturbations and also elevate indoor pollution by the transport of fine particulate matter. The purpose of this research Was to Study the indoor air conditions in the Royal Museum of Wawel Castle in Cracow, Poland, displaying amongst other Valuable works of art also a unique collection of Flemish tapestries. The investigation involved in the determination of transport and deposition of particulate matter brought in by visitors. The microclimate inside the exhibition rooms was also monitored. Samples of suspended particulates were collected inside and outside the museum in winter and summer-2006. On days with intensive tourist visits the concentration of total suspended particulates Was significantly higher (i.e., 130 mu g/m(3) in winter and 49 mu g/m(3) in summer) than on those days without tourists (i.e., 73 mu g/m(3) and 22 mu g/m(3) in winter and summer, respectively). The concentrations of all investigated elements were also considerably higher during the tourist flow. This was especially valid for soil dust associated elements (Si, K, Ca, A], and Ti), with considerably higher levels in summer than winter. This could be linked with much more frequent tourist activity in the Summer period. Also, the concentration of Cl Was Much higher ill winter than Summer, due to the use of deicing salts on the roads and pavements. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available