4.2 Article

Helicobacter pylori perceives the quorum-sensing molecule Al-2 as a chemorepellent via the chemoreceptor TIpB

Journal

MICROBIOLOGY-SGM
Volume 157, Issue -, Pages 2445-2455

Publisher

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.049353-0

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health Public Health Service [R01 A1050000, R01 DK075667]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Helicobacter pylori moves in response to environmental chemical cues using a chemotaxis two-component signal-transduction system. Autoinducer-2 (AI-2) is a quorum-sensing signal produced by the LuxS protein that accumulates in the bacterial environment in a density-dependent manner. We showed previously that a H. pylori luxS mutant was defective in motility on soft agar plates. Here we report that deletion of the luxS gene resulted in swimming behaviour with a reduced frequency of stops as compared to the wild-type strain. Stopping frequency was restored to wild-type levels by genetic complementation of the luxS mutation or by addition of synthetic 4,5-dihydroxy-2,3-pentanedione (DPD), which cyclizes to form AI-2. Synthetic DPD also increased the frequency of stops in wild-type H. pylori, similar to the behaviour induced by the known chemorepellent HCI. We found that whereas mutants lacking the chemoreceptor genes tIpA, tIpC or tIpD responded to an exogenous source of synthetic DPD, the chemoreceptor mutant tlpB was non-responsive to a gradient or uniform distribution of the chemical. Furthermore, a double mutant lacking both tlpB and luxS exhibited chemotactic behaviour similar to the tIpB single mutant, whereas a double mutant lacking both tIpB and the chemotransduction gene cheA behaved like a nonchemotactic cheA single mutant, supporting the model that tIpB functions in a signalling pathway downstream of luxS and upstream of cheA. We conclude that H. pylori perceives LuxS-produced Al-2 as a chemorepellent via the chemoreceptor TIpB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available