4.2 Article

Expression of two distinct types of pili by a hospital-acquired Enterococcus faecium isolate

Journal

MICROBIOLOGY-SGM
Volume 154, Issue -, Pages 3212-3223

Publisher

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.2008/020891-0

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Heath, Research and Development [6100.008]
  2. European Union Sixth Framework Programme [LSHE-CT-2007-037410]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surface filamentous structures designated pill, and implicated in virulence, have been found on the surfaces of several Gram-positive pathogens. This work describes the conditional expression of two phenotypically distinct pilus-like structures, designated PilA and PilB, on the surface of a hospital-adapted Enterococcus faecium bloodstream isolate. E faecium is an emerging Gram-positive opportunistic pathogen that can cause severe disease, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Expression of PilA- and PilB-type pili was analysed during different phases of growth in broth culture. During growth, PilA and RIB pilin subunits were expressed around the cross-wall in early-exponential-phase cells. Polymerization and migration of short PilB-type pili towards the poles occurred in cells from the exponential phase and long polymerized pili were expressed at the poles of cells grown to stationary phase. In contrast, PiIA-type pili were not expressed in broth culture, but only when cells were grown on solid media. Furthermore, surface expression of the PilA- and PilB-type pili was regulated in a temperature-dependent manner, as polymerization of two distinct types of pili at the surface only occurred when cells were grown at 37 degrees C; no pili were observed on cells grown at 21 degrees C. Hospital-aquired E faecium isolates were specifically enriched in pilin gene clusters, suggesting that conditional expression of pili may contribute to E faecium pathogenesis,

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available