4.6 Review

Patterns and Processes of Microbial Community Assembly

Journal

MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REVIEWS
Volume 77, Issue 3, Pages 342-356

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00051-12

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB1545913]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology [0921940, 1258160, 0922306, 0922267] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology [1027341] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Directorate For Geosciences
  7. Division Of Earth Sciences [1124576] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent research has expanded our understanding of microbial community assembly. However, the field of community ecology is inaccessible to many microbial ecologists because of inconsistent and often confusing terminology as well as unnecessarily polarizing debates. Thus, we review recent literature on microbial community assembly, using the framework of Vellend (Q. Rev. Biol. 85:183-206, 2010) in an effort to synthesize and unify these contributions. We begin by discussing patterns in microbial biogeography and then describe four basic processes (diversification, dispersal, selection, and drift) that contribute to community assembly. We also discuss different combinations of these processes and where and when they may be most important for shaping microbial communities. The spatial and temporal scales of microbial community assembly are also discussed in relation to assembly processes. Throughout this review paper, we highlight differences between microbes and macroorganisms and generate hypotheses describing how these differences may be important for community assembly. We end by discussing the implications of microbial assembly processes for ecosystem function and biodiversity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available