4.2 Article

A novel anti-peroxiredoxin autoantibody in patients with Kawasaki disease

Journal

MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages 56-61

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2011.00393.x

Keywords

Kawasaki disease; oxidative stress; peroxiredoxin; 8-isoprostaglandin F2a

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  2. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan
  3. Japan Rheumatism Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23591573, 22591182] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antibodies to the anti-oxidative peroxiredoxin (Prx) enzymes occur in both systemic autoimmune disease and vasculitis in adulthood. Because increased oxidative stress induces vasculitis in Kawasaki disease (KD), autoimmunity to Prxs in patients with KD was investigated. The presence of antibodies to Prx 1, 2 and 4 was analyzed by ELISA and Western blot. Of 30 patients with KD, 13 (43.3%) possessed antibodies to Prx 2, whereas these antibodies were present in only 1 of 10 patients (10.0%) with sepsis (4 with purulent meningitis and 6 with septicemia). In contrast, antibodies to Prx 1 and 4 were not detected in either group. There was no significant correlation among the titers of the three antibodies. Clinical parameters were compared between anti-Prx 2-positive and -negative patients. The presence of anti-Prx 2 antibodies correlated with a longer period of fever and poor response to high-dose ?-globulin therapy in patients with KD. Anti-Prx 2-positive patients had significantly greater excretion of urinary 8-isoprostaglandin than did anti-Prx 2-negative patients. These results provide the first evidence for an antibody to Prx 2 in patients with KD. They also suggest that this antibody might serve as a marker of disease severity and be involved in the pathophysiology of vasculitis in some patients with KD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available