4.3 Article

A novel bacterium carrying out anaerobic ammonium oxidation in a reactor for biological treatment of the filtrate of wastewater fermented sludge

Journal

MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 82, Issue 5, Pages 628-636

Publisher

MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA/SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1134/S002626171305007X

Keywords

anaerobic ammonium oxidation; new bacteria; description; wastewater treatment

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new genus and species of bacteria capable of ammonium oxidation under anaerobic conditions in the presence of nitrite is described. The enrichment culture was obtained from the Moscow River silt by sequential cultivation in reactors with selective conditions for anaerobic ammonium oxidation. Bacterial cells were coccoid, similar to 0.4 x 0.7 mu m, with the intracellular membrane structures typical of bacteria capable of anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammoxosome and paryphoplasm). The cells formed aggregates 5-25 mu m in diameter (10 mu m on average). They were readily adhered to solid surfaces. The cells were morphologically labile: they easily lost their content and changed their morphology during fixation for electron microscopy. The organism was capable of ammonium oxidation with nitrite. The semisaturation constants Ks for nitrite and ammonium were 0.38 mg N-NO2/L and 0.41 mg N-NH4/L, respectively. The maximal nitrite concentrations for growth were 90 and 75 mg N-NO2/L for single and continuous application, respectively. The doubling time was 32 days, mu(max) = 0.022 day(-1), the optimal temperature and pH were 20A degrees C and 7.8-8.3, respectively. According to the results of 16S rRNA gene sequencing, the bacterium was assigned to a new genus and species within the phylum Planctomycetes. The proposed name for the new bacterium is Candidatus Anammoximicrobium moscowii gen. nov., sp. nov. (a microorganism carrying out anaerobic ammonium oxidation, isolated in the Moscow region).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available