4.7 Article

Overlapping binding of PhoP and AfsR to the promoter region of glnR in Streptomyces coelicolor

Journal

MICROBIOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 167, Issue 9, Pages 532-535

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2012.02.010

Keywords

Global regulators; Phosphate control; GlnR; PhoR-PhoP; AfsR

Categories

Funding

  1. grant CICYT (Ministry of Science and Innovation, Madrid)
  2. SYSMO STREAM Project of the European Union [GEN2006-27745-E/SYS]
  3. Junta de Castilla y Leon Project [GR.119]
  4. [Bio2006-14853-O2-1]
  5. [BIO2010-16094]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Growth of soil bacteria is often limited by the availability of essential nutrients such as carbon, nitrogen and phosphate. The reaction to a specific nutrient starvation triggers interconnected responses to equilibrate the metabolism. It is known that PhoP (response regulator involved in phosphate control) specifically binds to several promoters of genes involved in nitrogen metabolism which are also regulated by GlnR (regulator involved in nitrogen control). In this article we report a novel cross-talk between GlnR and the SARP-like regulator, AfsR. AfsR binds to some PhoP-regulated promoters including those of afsS (a small regulatory protein of secondary metabolism), pstS (a component of the phosphate transport system) and phoRP (encoding the two component system itself). We have characterized the regulation exerted upon the nitrogen regulator glnR gene by AfsR, using EMSA and DNase I footprinting assays as well as in vivo expression studies with Delta phoP, Delta afsR and Delta afsR-Delta phoP mutants. Both PhoP and AfsR proteins are able to bind to overlapping regions within the glnR promoter producing different effects. This work demonstrates a cross-talk of three different regulators of both primary and secondary metabolism. (C) 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available