4.5 Article

Genotypic and phenotypic features of Arcobacter butzleri pathogenicity

Journal

MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS
Volume 76, Issue -, Pages 19-25

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2014.09.004

Keywords

Arcobacter butzleri; Virulence; Adhesion; Invasion; Intracellular survival; Inflammation

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/66857/2009]
  2. Fundo Social Europeu
  3. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia through the program COMPETE [PEst-C/SAU/UI0709/2011]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/66857/2009] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Even though Arcobacter butzleri has been implicated in some human disease as diarrhoea and bacteraemia, much of its pathogenesis and virulence factors remain unclear. In this work we have compared pathogenic and genotypic properties of six A. butzleri isolates from human and non-human sources. The tested isolates showed to be susceptible to tetracyclines and aminoglycosides, however non-human isolates were all resistant to quinolones. The ability to form biofilms was variable among the tested strains, and all of them showed a weak haemolytic activity. The presence of nine putative virulence genes was determined, with cadF, ciaB, cj1349, mviN, pldA, tlyA being detected in all strains, while irgA (3/6), hecA (5/6), hecB (4/6) were detected only in some strains. High levels of adhesion were observed for A. butzleri on Caco-2 cells, with pre-existing inflammation showing no significant effect on the adherence ability; yet variable levels of invasion were observed. A. butzleri isolates were able to survive intracellularly in Caco-2 cells and to induce a significant up-regulation of interleukin-8 secretion and structural cell rearrangements. These data brings new insights on A. butzleri virulence and highlights its pathogenic potential. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available