4.7 Article

Description of Freshwater Bacterial Assemblages from the Upper Parana River Floodpulse System, Brazil

Journal

MICROBIAL ECOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages 94-103

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00248-008-9398-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CNPq [260/03]
  2. American Museum of Natural History
  3. Sackler Institute of Comparative Genomics
  4. MacCracken Fellowship (NYU)
  5. Hudson River Foundation, NY

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacteria were identified from a large, seasonally flooded river (Parana River, Brazil) and two floodplain habitats that were part of the same river system yet very different in nature: clearwater Gar double dagger as Lagoon and the highly humic waters of Patos Lagoon. Bacterioplankton were collected during mid-summer (Jan. 2002) from water samples (2 l) filtered first through a 1.2-mu m filter then a 0.2-mu m membrane filter representing the particle-attached and free-living sub-communities, respectively. DNA was extracted from filters and purified and a 16S rRNA clone library established for each habitat. Over 300 clones were sequenced and checked for similarity to existing 16S sequences in GenBank using the BLAST algorithm with default parameters. Further classification of clones was done using a species backbone attachment followed by parsimony analysis. The majority (85%) of sequences, referred to here as operational taxonomic units (OTUs), were most similar to uncultured bacterium 16S sequences. OTUs from each Proteobacteria sub-phylum (alpha, beta, gamma, delta, E >) were present in the Upper Parana River system, as well as members of the Bacteroidetes. The microbial assemblage from Patos Lagoon was least like other samples in that it had no Firmicutes present and was dominated by Actinobacteria. Verrucomicrobia OTUs were only found in the free-living assemblage. This study documents the presence of globally distributed phyla in Upper Parana River and taxa unique to habitat and particle attachment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available