4.6 Article

High susceptibility to respiratory Acinetobacter baumannii infection in A/J mice is associated with a delay in early pulmonary recruitment of neutrophils

Journal

MICROBES AND INFECTION
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages 946-955

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2009.06.003

Keywords

Acinetobacter; Pneumonia; Neutrophils; Host defense; Mice

Funding

  1. National Research Council Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acinetobacter baumannii is an important cause of both community-associated and nosocomial pneumonia, which have become increasingly difficult to treat because of the rapid development of resistance to multiple antibiotics. Despite its clinical importance, the pathogenesis of and host defense against respiratory A. baumannii infection remains largely unknown. To examine host factors that could contribute to the defense, we compared the susceptibilities of A/J and C57BL/6 mice to intranasal (i.n.) inoculation with A. baumannii. We found that A/J mice were significantly more susceptible to infection with higher mortality (P < 0.05) and tissue bacterial burdens (P < 0.01) as well as greater histopathology in the lung and spleen than C57BU6 mice. More importantly, the high susceptibility of A/J mice was associated with a reduced local proinflammatory cytokine/chemokine (particularly IL-1 beta, MIP-2 and TNF-alpha) responses and a significant delay and reduction in the early influx of neutrophils in the lung (P < 0.05). Intranasal administration of neutrophil-inducing chemokine MIP-2 to A/J mice enhanced pulmonary neutrophil influx and partially restored host resistance to A. baumannii to a level comparable to the more resistant C57BU6 mice. Our results imply that the early recruitment of neutrophils into the lung is critical for initiating an efficient host defense against respiratory A. baumannii infection. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All fights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available