4.7 Review

Solid-phase capture for the detection and relative quantification of S-nitrosoproteins by mass spectrometry

Journal

METHODS
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages 130-137

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.10.001

Keywords

Nitric oxide; S-nitrosylation; S-nitrosothiol; Redox; Proteomics; Mass spectrometry; Nitrosative; Palmitoylation

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL106121]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The proteomic analysis of S-nitrosylated protein (SNO-proteins) has long depended on the biotin switch technique (BST), which requires blocking of free thiols, ascorbate-based denitrosylation of SNO-Cys, biotinylation of nascent thiol and avidin-based affinity isolation. A more recent development is resin assisted-capture of SNO-proteins (SNO-RAC), which substitutes thiopropyl Sepharose (TPS) for biotin-avidin, thus reducing the number of steps required for enrichment of S-nitrosylated proteins. In addition, SNO-RAC facilitates on-resin proteolytic digestion following SNO-protein capture, greatly simplifying the purification of peptides containing sites of S-nitrosylation (SNO-sites). This resin-based approach has also now been applied to detection of alternative Cys-based modifications, including S-palmitoylation (Acyl-RAC) and S-oxidation (Ox-RAC). Here, we review the important steps to minimize false-positive identification of SNO-proteins, give detailed methods for processing of protein-bound TPS for mass spectrometry (MS) based analysis, and discuss the various quantitative MS methods that are compatible with SNO-RAC. We also discuss strategies to overcome the current limitations surrounding MS-based SNO-site localization in peptides containing more than one potential target Cys residue. This article therefore serves as a starting point and guide for the MS-focused exploration of SNO-proteomes by SNO-RAC. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available