4.7 Article

Studying the effect of crowding and dehydration on DNA G-quadruplexes

Journal

METHODS
Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages 76-83

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.02.011

Keywords

G-quadruplex; Molecular crowding; Hydration; Spectroscopic methodologies

Funding

  1. Italian PRIN funding
  2. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (A.I.R.C.) [6255]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intracellular environment is crowded with biomolecules that occupy a significant fraction (up to 40%) of the cellular volume, with a total concentration in the range 300-400 mg/ml. Recently, the effect of crowding/dehydrating agents on the DNA G-quadruplexes has become a subject of an increasing interest. Crowding and/or dehydrating agents have been used to simulate how G-quadruplexes behave under cell-mimicking conditions characterized by a large excluded volume and a lower water activity. Indeed, the presence of both steric crowding and a lower water activity can affect G-quadruplex stability, their folding/unfolding kinetics, as well as their binding processes with proteins or small ligands. Many of these effects can be explored experimentally by measuring the dependence of the conformational stability, isomerisation kinetics and equilibria on the concentration of cosolutes which do not interact with the molecules (G-quadruplexes) under investigation. Spectroscopic methodologies, like circular dichroism. UV and fluorescence, have been widely employed to study G-quadruplexes in dilute solution. Here we focus on some aspects that need to be taken into account when employing such techniques in the presence of large amount of a cosolute. Additionally, we discuss possible problems/artifacts that arise in setting experiments in presence of these commonly employed cosolutes and in interpreting the results. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available