4.5 Article

Characteristics of the Hot Workability of an AZ91D Magnesium Alloy Using 3D Processing Maps

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11663-018-1415-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51605421]
  2. Doctoral Fund of Yanshan University [B966]
  3. Research Program for Young Teachers of Yanshan University [15LGB003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hot compression tests were carried out on an a homogenized as-cast AZ91D magnesium alloy at temperatures ranging from 220 degrees C to 380 degrees C and strain rates ranging from 0.001 to 10s(-1) by means of a Gleeble-3500 thermo mechanical simulator. True stress--true strain curves were given. A constitutive modeling of the homogenized alloy was proposed to describe the flow characteristic. The deformation activation energy was estimated to be 142.27kJmol(-1). Continuous three-dimensional (3D) processing maps were developed based on the true stress-true strain data as a function of strain, temperature, and strain rate. A detailed interpretation of the established 3D processing maps was conducted. The results showed that the variation of the 3D processing maps was significantly strain dependent. Dynamic recrystallization domains with high-power dissipation efficiencies and instability domains with negative instability coefficient were identified from the 3D power dissipation maps and the 3D instability maps, respectively. It was also revealed that the instability domains distinctly became enlarged with the increasing strain. Optimized temperature and strain rate ranges at various strains were determined. Furthermore, hot workability characteristics were clarified through examining the microstructures obtained under conditions falling within stability and instability domains with various strains. The results proved that the developed 3D processing maps can provide an accurate prediction of the hot deformation behavior for the homogenized AZ91D alloy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available