4.6 Article

On the Texture Formation of Selective Laser Melted Ti-6Al-4V

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-014-2218-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/I033335/2, EP/I033335/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I033335/2, EP/I033335/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Selective laser melting (SLM) has been shown to be an attractive manufacturing route for the production of alpha/beta titanium alloys. The relationship between the SLM process parameters and the microstructure of titanium alloys has been the object of several works, but the texture formation during the SLM process has yet to be understood. In the present study, the texture formation of Ti-6Al-4V components was investigated in order to clarify which microstructural features can be tailored during the SLM process. The microstructural characterization of the as-built components was carried out using various microscopy techniques. Phase and texture analysis were carried out using backscattered electron imaging and diffraction. It was found that as-built components consist exclusively of alpha' martensitic phase precipitated from prior beta columnar grains. The texture of the prior beta phase was reconstructed and discussed in relation to the used SLM process parameters. It was found that the beta grain solidification is influenced by the laser scan strategy and that the beta phase has a strong aOE (c) 100 > texture along its grain growth direction. The alpha' martensitic laths that originate from the parent beta grains precipitate according to the Burgers orientation relationship. It was observed that alpha' laths clusters from the same beta grain have a specific misorientation that minimizes the local shape strain. Texture inheritance across successive deposited layers was also observed and discussed in relation to various variant selection mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available