4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Experimental investigation on the efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors with nanofluids

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 88, Issue -, Pages 165-171

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.09.053

Keywords

Nanofluids; Flat-plate solar collector; Solar energy; Collecting efficiency; Heat gain

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51476059]
  2. Guangdong University Heat Pump Engineering Technology Development Center [KJZX-0058]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, Cu-H2O nanofluids with different mass fraction and size were prepared through two-step method. Its thermal conductivities and the effect of Cu-H2O nanofluids on the efficiency of a flat-plate solar collector was investigated experimentally. Meanwhile, the water temperature, heat gain of the flat-plate solar water heater and the frictional resistance coefficient of working fluid were also investigated. The mass flow rate of medium was 140 L/h. The experimental results show that the thermal conductivities can be enhanced observably. The efficiency of solar collector was enhanced by 23.83% with using Cu-H2O nanofluids (25 nm, 0.1 wt%) as the absorbing medium. The efficiency of Cu-H2O nanofluids (25 nm, 0.2 wt%) is lower than that of Cu-H2O nanofluids (25 nm, 0.1 wt%). With the nanoparticle size increasing, the efficiency of solar collector decreased. The highest temperature and highest heat gain of water in the nanofluid (25 nm, 0.1 wt%) tank can be increased up to 12.24% and 24.52% compared with water tank, respectively. The increment rate of the frictional resistance coefficient is less than 1% in the whole working temperature area. From the results, it can be indicated that the Cu-H2O nanofluids is suitable for enhancing the efficiency of flat-plate solar collector. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available