3.9 Article

The fatty-acid composition and nutrition of deep-sea holothurians from the Sea of Okhotsk

Journal

RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF MARINE BIOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages 448-455

Publisher

MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA/SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1134/S106307401506005X

Keywords

holothurians; Sea of Okhotsk; fatty acids; stable isotopes; trophic relationships; resource partitioning

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [14-50-00034]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The results of a comparative study of the fatty-acid composition in eight species of holothurians that were collected in the Sea of Okhotsk in the area of the Kuril Islands (depths of 90-560 m) are presented. It is shown that interspecific differences in the fatty-acid compositions of the holothurians were consistent with the isotope composition (delta C-13 and delta N-15) and the structural features of the tentacles and the lifestyle of holothurians, as indicators of trophic resources used by these holothurians. According to the results of the cluster analysis, the holothurians were divided into three groups. The first group included suspension-feeding dendrochirotides Eupentacta pusilla and Pseudocnus fallax with a high content of the fatty acid 20:5(n-3), which is a marker of diatoms, and with the delta N-15 values that are typical of consumers of suspended organic matter. The second group consisted of the dendrochirotides Psolus chitonoides and Psolidium sp. with a much lower content of 20:5 (n-3) and higher contents of 20:4 (n-6) and 22:6 (n-3), as well as high values of delta N-15, which are typical of surface deposit-feeders. The third group consisted of surface and subsurface depositfeeders, Chiridota sp., Molpadia orientalis, Pseudostichopus mollis, and Synallactes nozawai. Very high contents of 20: 4 (n-6) and 21: 4 (n-7) were typical of the third group and the highest values of delta N-15, indicating feeding on repeatedly recycled organic matter.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available