4.4 Article

LC- and CZE-ICP-MS approaches for the in vivo analysis of the anticancer drug candidate sodium trans-[tetrachloridobis(1H-indazole)ruthenate(III)] (KP1339) in mouse plasma

Journal

METALLOMICS
Volume 3, Issue 10, Pages 1049-1055

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1mt00055a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FFG-Austrian Research Promotion Agency [811591]
  2. Austrian Council for Research and Technology Development [IS526001]
  3. FWF-Austrian Science Fund [L473-B11, I496-B11]
  4. COST [D39, CM0902]
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [L 473] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ruthenium-indazole complexes are promising anticancer agents undergoing clinical trials. KP1339 is administered intravenously (i.v.), where serum proteins are the first available biological binding partners. In order to gain a better insight into the mode of action, mice were treated with different doses of KP1339 i.v. and sacrificed at different time points. The blood plasma was isolated from blood samples and analyzed by capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) and size exclusion/anion exchange chromatography (SEC-IC) both combined on-line to inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The performance of the analytical methodology was compared and the interaction of KP1339 with mouse plasma proteins characterized in vivo. Interestingly, the samples of the mice treated with 50 mg kg(-1) and terminated after 24 h showed a ca. 4-fold lowered albumin content and increased ruthenation of albumin aggregates as compared to the untreated control group and the 40 mg kg(-1) group. The majority of Ru was bound to albumin and the stoichiometry of the KP1339 protein binding was determined through the molar Ru/S ratio. In general, good agreement of the data obtained with both techniques was achieved and the SEC-IC method was found to be more sensitive as compared to the CZE-ICP-MS approach, whereas the latter benefits from the shorter analysis time and lower sample consumption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available