4.4 Article

Application of L-EDA in metabonomics data handling: global metabolite profiling and potential biomarker discovery of epithelial ovarian cancer prognosis

Journal

METABOLOMICS
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 614-622

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11306-011-0286-3

Keywords

Metabonomics; Ovarian cancer; Prognosis biomarker; Solution capacity limited EDA; Estimation of distribution algorithms

Funding

  1. National High-tech R&D Program (863 Program) [2006AA02Z342]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2007CB914701]
  3. State Ministry of Science & Technology of China
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20835006]
  5. State Key Science & Technology Project for Infectious Diseases [2008ZX10002-019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solution capacity limited estimation of distribution algorithm (L-EDA) is proposed and applied to ovarian cancer prognosis biomarker discovery to expatiate on its potential in metabonomics studies. Sera from healthy women, epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), recurrent EOC and non-recurrent EOC patients were analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The metabolite data were processed by L-EDA to discover potential EOC prognosis biomarkers. After L-EDA filtration, 78 out of 714 variables were selected, and the relationships among four groups were visualized by principle component analysis, it was observed that with the L-EDA filtered variables, non-recurrent EOC and recurrent EOC groups could be separated, which was not possible with the initial data. Five metabolites (six variables) with P < 0.05 in Wilcoxon test were discovered as potential EOC prognosis biomarkers, and their classification accuracy rates were 86.9% for recurrent EOC and non-recurrent EOC, and 88.7% for healthy + non-recurrent EOC and EOC + recurrent EOC. The results show that L-EDA is a powerful tool for potential biomarker discovery in metabonomics study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available