4.7 Article

Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of succinate from glycerol

Journal

METABOLIC ENGINEERING
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages 409-419

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2010.06.002

Keywords

Metabolic engineering; Glycerol fermentation; Escherichia coli; Biochemicals and biofuels; Succinate

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [CBET-0645188]
  2. National Research Initiative of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service [2005-35504-16698]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glycerol has become an ideal feedstock for the microbial production of bio-based chemicals due to its abundance, low cost, and high degree of reduction. We have previously reported the pathways and mechanisms for the utilization of glycerol by Escherichia coli in minimal salts medium under microaerobic conditions. Here we capitalize on such results to engineer E. coli for the production of value-added succinate from glycerol. Through metabolic engineering of E. coli metabolism, succinate production was greatly elevated by(1) blocking pathways for the synthesis of competing by-products lactate, ethanol, and acetate and (2) expressing Lactococcus lactis pyruvate carboxylase to drive the generation of succinate from the pyruvate node (as opposed to that of phosphoenolpyruvate). As such, these metabolic engineering strategies coupled cell growth to succinate production because the synthesis of succinate remained as the primary route of NAD+ regeneration. This feature enabled the operation of the succinate pathway in the absence of selective pressure (e.g. antibiotics). Our biocatalysts demonstrated a maximum specific productivity of similar to 400 mg succinate/gcell/h and a yield of 0.69 g succinate/g glycerol, on par with the use of glucose as a feedstock. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available