4.7 Article

Transcriptome analysis guided metabolic engineering of Bacillus subtilis for riboflavin production

Journal

METABOLIC ENGINEERING
Volume 11, Issue 4-5, Pages 243-252

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2009.05.002

Keywords

Riboflavin; Bacillus subtilis; Transcriptome; PRPP pool; Metabolic engineering

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC-20536040]
  2. National Project of Key Fundamental Research [2007CB707802]
  3. Development Project of Science and Technology of Tianjin [05YFGZGX04500]
  4. Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B06006]
  5. CapitalBio Co. Ltd
  6. [GSE12873]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comparative transcriptome profiling between a riboflavin-producing Bacillus subtilis strain RH33 and the wild-type strain B. subtilis 168 was performed, complemented with metabolite pool and nucleotide sequence analysis, to rationally identify new targets for improving riboflavin production. The pur operon (purEKBCSQLFMNHD) together with other PurR-regulated genes (glyA, guaC, pbuG, xpt-pbuX, yqhZ-folD, and pbuO) was all down-regulated in RH33, which consequently limited the supply of the riboflavin precursors. As 5-phospho-ribosyl-1(a)-pyrophosphate (PRPP) strongly inhibits the binding of PurR to its targets, it was inferred that the reduced expression of PurR-regulated genes might be caused by a low PRPP pool, which was subsequently confirmed by metabolite analysis. Thus, we selected and co-overexpressed prs and ywlF genes in RH33, which are involved in the biosynthetic pathway of PRPP from ribulose-5-phosphate. This co-amplification led to an elevated PRPP pool and thus the increased transcript abundances of PurR-regulated genes participated in riboflavin precursor biosynthesis. The riboflavin titer was increased by 25% (up to 15 gl(-1)) in fed-batch fermentation. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available