4.7 Article

Translating biochemical network models between different kinetic formats

Journal

METABOLIC ENGINEERING
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 87-100

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2008.10.002

Keywords

Biochemical network modelling; Alternative kinetic formats; Model prediction; Model simplification

Funding

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research [BMBF 0313704]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mechanistic biochemical network models describe the dynamics of intracellular metabolite pools in terms of substance concentrations, stoichiometry and reaction kinetics. Data from stimulus response experiments are currently the most informative source for in-vivo parameter estimation in such models. However, only a part of the parameters of classical enzyme kinetic models can usually be estimated from typical stimulus response data. For this reason, several alternative kinetic formats using different languages'' (e. g. linear, power laws, linlog, generic and convenience) have been proposed to reduce the model complexity. The present contribution takes a rigorous multi-lingual'' approach to data evaluation by translating biochemical network models from one kinetic format into another. For this purpose, a new high-performance algorithm has been developed and tested. Starting with a given model, it replaces as many kinetic terms as possible by alternative expressions while still reproducing the experimental data. Application of the algorithm to a published model for Escherichia coli's sugar metabolism demonstrates the power of the new method. It is shown that model translation is a powerful tool to investigate the information content of stimulus response data and the predictive power of models. Moreover, the local and global approximation capabilities of the models are elucidated and some pitfalls of traditional single model approaches to data evaluation are revealed. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available