Journal
MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 1216-1226Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000209
Keywords
ACCELEROMETER; HEART RATE; ACTIHEART; ACTIGRAPH; CALORIMETRY
Categories
Funding
- USDA/ARS [58-6250-0-008]
- National Institutes of Health [R01 DK085163]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Purpose: Accurate, nonintrusive, and feasible methods are needed to predict energy expenditure (EE) and physical activity (PA) levels in preschoolers. Herein, we validated cross-sectional time series (CSTS) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) models based on accelerometry and heart rate (HR) for the prediction of EE using room calorimetry and doubly labeled water (DLW) and established accelerometry cut points for PA levels. Methods: Fifty preschoolers, mean +/- SD age of 4.5 +/- 0.8 yr, participated in room calorimetry for minute-by-minute measurements of EE, accelerometer counts (AC) (Actiheart and ActiGraph GT3X+), and HR (Actiheart). Free-living 105 children, ages 4.6 +/- 0.9 yr, completed the 7-d DLW procedure while wearing the devices. AC cut points for PA levels were established using smoothing splines and receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: On the basis of calorimetry, mean percent errors for EE were -2.9% +/- 10.8% and -1.1% +/- 7.4% for CSTS models and -1.9% +/- 9.6% and 1.3% +/- 8.1% for MARS models using the Actiheart and ActiGraph+HR devices, respectively. On the basis of DLW, mean percent errors were -0.5% +/- 9.7% and 4.1% +/- 8.5% for CSTS models and 3.2% +/- 10.1% and 7.5% +/- 10.0% for MARS models using the Actiheart and ActiGraph+HR devices, respectively. Applying activity EE thresholds, final accelerometer cut points were determined: 41, 449, and 1297 cpm for Actiheart x-axis; 820, 3908, and 6112 cpm for ActiGraph vector magnitude; and 240, 2120, and 4450 cpm for ActiGraph x-axis for sedentary/light, light/moderate, and moderate/vigorous PA (MVPA), respectively. On the basis of confusion matrices, correctly classified rates were 81%-83% for sedentary PA, 58%-64% for light PA, and 62%-73% for MVPA. Conclusions: The lack of bias and acceptable limits of agreement affirms the validity of the CSTS and MARS models for the prediction of EE in preschool-aged children. Accelerometer cut points are satisfactory for the classification of sedentary, light, and moderate/vigorous levels of PA in preschoolers.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available