4.6 Article

Activity Recognition Using a Single Accelerometer Placed at the Wrist or Ankle

Journal

MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE
Volume 45, Issue 11, Pages 2193-2203

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31829736d6

Keywords

ACTIVITY CLASSIFICATION; INERTIAL SENSING; MOBILE HEALTH; LEAVE-ONE-SUBJECT-OUT VALIDATION; ACTIVITY MEASUREMENT; ENERGY EXPENDITURE

Categories

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health [5UO1HL091737]
  2. Italian Ministry of Education, Universities and Research, MIUR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Large physical activity surveillance projects such as the UK Biobank and NHANES are using wrist-worn accelerometer-based activity monitors that collect raw data. The goal is to increase wear time by asking subjects to wear the monitors on the wrist instead of the hip, and then to use information in the raw signal to improve activity type and intensity estimation. The purposes of this work was to obtain an algorithm to process wrist and ankle raw data and to classify behavior into four broad activity classes: ambulation, cycling, sedentary, and other activities. Methods: Participants (N = 33) wearing accelerometers on the wrist and ankle performed 26 daily activities. The accelerometer data were collected, cleaned, and preprocessed to extract features that characterize 2-, 4-, and 12.8-s data windows. Feature vectors encoding information about frequency and intensity of motion extracted from analysis of the raw signal were used with a support vector machine classifier to identify a subject's activity. Results were compared with categories classified by a human observer. Algorithms were validated using a leave-one-subject-out strategy. The computational complexity of each processing step was also evaluated. Results: With 12.8-s windows, the proposed strategy showed high classification accuracies for ankle data (95.0%) that decreased to 84.7% for wrist data. Shorter (4 s) windows only minimally decreased performances of the algorithm on the wrist to 84.2%. Conclusions: A classification algorithm using 13 features shows good classification into the four classes given the complexity of the activities in the original data set. The algorithmis computationally efficient and could be implemented in real time onmobile devices with only 4-s latency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available