4.6 Article

Run Sprint Interval Training Improves Aerobic Performance but Not Maximal Cardiac Output

Journal

MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 115-122

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e5eacd

Keywords

INTERVAL TRAINING; STROKE VOLUME; ARTERIAL-MIXED VENOUS OXYGEN DIFFERENCE; CARDIOVASCULAR ADAPTATIONS; MUSCLE ADAPTATIONS; BODY COMPOSITION

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MACPHERSON, R. E. K., T. J. HAZELL, T. D. OLVER, D. H. PATERSON, and P. W. R. LEMON. Run Sprint Interval Training Improves Aerobic Performance but Not Maximal Cardiac Output. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 115-122, 2011. Repeated maximal-intensity short-duration exercise (sprint interval training, SIT) can produce muscle adaptations similar to endurance training (ET) despite a much reduced training volume. However, most SIT data use cycling, and little is known about its effects on body composition or maximal cardiac output ((Q) over dot(max)). Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess body composition, 2000-m run time trial, (V) over dotO(2max), and (Q) over dot(max) effects of run SIT versus ET. Methods: Men and women (n = 10 per group; mean +/- SD: age = 24 +/- 3 yr) trained three times per week for 6 wk with SIT, 30-s all-out run sprints (manually driven treadmill), four to six bouts per session, 4-min recovery per bout, versus ET, 65% (V) over dotO(2max) for 30 to 60 min.d(-1). Results: Training improved (P < 0.05) body composition, 2000-m run time trial performance, and (V) over dotO(2max) in both groups. Fat mass decreased 12.4% with SIT (mean +/- SEM; 13.7 +/- 1.6 to 12.0 +/- 1.6 kg) and 5.8% with ET (13.9 +/- 1.7 to 13.1 +/- 1.6 kg). Lean mass increased 1% in both groups. Time trial performance improved 4.6% with SIT (-25.6 +/- 8.1 s) and 5.9% with ET (-31.9 +/- 6.3 s). (V) over dotO(2max) increased 11.5% with SIT (46.8 +/- 1.6 to 52.2 +/- 2.0 mL.kg.(-1).min(-1)) and 12.5% with ET (44.0 +/- 2.0 to 49.5 +/- 2.6 mL.kg(-1).min(-1)). None of these improvements differed between groups. In contrast, (Q) over dot(max) increased by 9.5% with ET only (22.2 +/- 2.0 to 24.3 +/- 1.6 L.min(-1)). Conclusions: Despite a fraction of the time commitment, run SIT induces similar body composition, (V) over dotO(2max), and performance adaptations as ET, but with no effect on (Q) over dot(max). These data suggest that adaptations with ET are of central origin primarily, whereas those with SIT are more peripheral.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available