4.6 Article

Accelerometer Prediction of Energy Expenditure: Vector Magnitude Versus Vertical Axis

Journal

MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
Volume 41, Issue 12, Pages 2199-2206

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181aa3a0e

Keywords

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; RT3; TRIAXIAL ACCELEROMETER; UNIAXIAL ACCELEROMETER

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 CA-121005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HOWE, C. A., J. W. STAUDENMAYER, and P. S. FREEDSON. Accelerometer Prediction of Energy Expenditure: Vector Magnitude Versus Vertical Axis. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 4 1, No. 12, pp. 2199-2206, 2009. It is suggested that triaxial accelerometers (RT3) are superior to single-plane accelerometers for predicting energy expenditure (EE). Purpose: To compare the RT3 Uniaxial and triaxial prediction of activity EE (AFE) during treadmill activities (TM) and activities of daily living (ADL). Methods: Two hundred and twelve subjects (aged 20-60 yr) completed TM speeds of 1.34, 1.56, and 2.23 m.s(-1) at 0% and 3% grades, stair ascent/descent, moving a box, and two randomly assigned ADL. Subjects wore a portable indirect calorimeter to measure EE to calculate AEE by subtracting resting metabolic rate. Acceleration counts in the vertical (V), medial-lateral, and anterior-posterior planes were collected in a single RT3 secured to the hip. Predicted AEE (RT3AEE) was estimated from vector magnitude (VM) counts using a proprietary algorithm. A paired t-test compared RT3AEE versus AFE. The relationship among V and VM counts and AEE was examined using linear regression analyses. Results: RT3 overestimated AEE for all activities combined, overestimated for TM (9.0%), and underestimated for ADL (34.3%; P < 0.001). The R-2 values between RT3AEE and AEE for TM and ADL were R-2 = 0.78 and R-2 = 0.15, respectively. The RT3 underestimated activity with greater upper body movements by 24.4%-64.5% (P < 0.001). V and VM counts were similarly related to AEE (R-2 = 0.35) and RT3AEE (R-2 = 0.83-0.89). Conclusions: Although the RT3 did not accurately predict AEE from accelerometer counts, stronger relationships existed between predicted and measured AEE for TM compared with ADL. Compared with V counts, using VM counts to predict AEE did not significantly improve the relationship between counts and AEE. Analytic techniques beyond linear regression with VM as a covariate or with counts from each axis entering the model separately may improve estimates of AEE from triaxial accelerometers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available