4.6 Article

Determinants of 800-m and 1500-m running performance using allometric models

Journal

MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages 345-350

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a83dc

Keywords

middle-distance running; VO2max; economy; curvilinear power function

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To identify the optimal aerobic determinants of elite, middle-distance running (MDR) performance, using proportional allometric models. Methods: Sixty-two national and international male and female 800-m and 1500-m runners undertook an incremental exercise test to volitional exhaustion. Mean submaximal running economy (ECON), speed at lactate threshold (speedLT), maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max), and speed associated with VO2max (speedVO(2max)) were paired with best performance times recorded within 30 d. The data were analyzed using a proportional power-function ANCOVA model. Results: The analysis identified significant differences in running speeds with main effects for sex and distance, with VO2max and ECON as the covariate predictors (P < 0.0001). The results suggest a proportional curvilinear association between running speed and the ratio (VO2max.ECON-0.71) (0.35) explaining 95.9% of the variance in performance. The model was cross-validated with a further group of highly trained MDR, demonstrating strong agreement (95% limits, 0.05 +/- 0.29 m.s(-1)) between predicted and actual performance speeds (R-2 = 93.6%). The model indicates that for a male 1500-m runner with a VO2max of 3.81 L.min(-1) and ECON of 15 L.km(-1) to improve from 250 to 240 s, it would require a change in VO2max from 3.81 to 4.28 L.min(-1), an increase of Delta 0.47 L.min(-1). However, improving by the same margin of 10 s from 225 to 215 s would require a much greater increase in VO2max, from 5.14 to 5.85 L.min(-1) an increase of Delta 0.71 L.min(-1) (where ECON remains constant). Conclusion: A proportional curvilinear ratio Of VO2max divided by ECON explains 95.9% of the variance in MDR performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available