4.5 Article

Using DREEM to compare graduating students' perceptions of learning environments at medical schools adopting contrasting educational strategies

Journal

MEDICAL TEACHER
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages S25-S31

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.656747

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Dr Hamza Alkholi Chair for Developing Medical Education in KSA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In response to growing concerns about conventional modes of teaching and learning in medicine, some medical schools in Saudi Arabia have converted to hybrid problem-based learning (PBL) curricula while others continue to implement traditional discipline-based curricula. Understanding students' perceptions of traditional versus PBL learning environments can be helpful for evaluating program strengths and weaknesses and should promote curriculum development. Aim: The purpose of this study was therefore to evaluate the educational environments of two medical schools in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia from perspectives of graduating medical students using the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) inventory. Results: Compared to medical school implementing a hybrid PBL curriculum, the overall score on the inventory for the conventional school was statistically significantly less (p < 0.001). In addition, students experiencing the hybrid-PBL curriculum held significantly higher perceptions in the learning, academic self-perception and atmosphere sub-domains of the inventory (p < 0.001). Overall, our results align with previous studies pertaining to DREEM scores of other regional conventional and international PBL medical schools. Conclusion: We conclude that applying DREEM as a diagnostic tool provides important insights and understanding of learning environments where different educational strategies are adopted and which may be in need of development and change. Implications for curriculum development and improvement of learning environments in health professions education institutions are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available