4.5 Article

Cross-cultural adaptation of an innovative approach to learning about difficult conversations in healthcare

Journal

MEDICAL TEACHER
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages e57-e64

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.534207

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CURA Research Center
  2. San Paolo Hospital, Milan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The Program to Enhance Relational and Communication Skills (PERCS) was developed at a large hospital in the United States to enhance clinicians' preparedness to engage in difficult conversations. Aim: aEuro integral To describe the implementation of PERCS in an Italian hospital and assess the program's efficacy. Methods: aEuro integral The Italian PERCS program featured 4-h experiential workshops enrolling 10--15 interdisciplinary participants. The workshops were organized around the enactment and debriefing of realistic case scenarios portrayed by actors and volunteer clinicians. Before and after the workshop, participants rated their perceived preparation, communication and relational skills, confidence, and anxiety on 5-point Likert scales. Open-ended questions explored their reflections on the learning. T-tests and content analysis were used to analyze the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. Results: aEuro integral 146 clinicians attended 13 workshops. Participants reported better preparation, confidence, and communication skills (p < 0.001) after the workshops. The program had a different impact depending on the discipline. Participants valued the emphasis on group feedback, experiential and interdisciplinary learning, and the patient's perspective, and acquired: new communication skills, self-reflective attitude, reframed perspective, and interdisciplinary teamwork. Conclusion: aEuro integral PERCS proved culturally adaptable to the Italian context and effective in improving participants'' sense of preparation, communication skills, and confidence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available