Journal
MEDICAL PHYSICS
Volume 40, Issue 7, Pages -Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1118/1.4810968
Keywords
prostate segmentation; level set; shape constraint; 3D end-firing TRUS
Funding
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Ontario Institute of Cancer Research (OICR)
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Canada Research Scholarship (CGS)
- Canada Research Chair Program
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Purpose: Prostate segmentation is an important step in the planning and treatment of 3D end-firing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy. In order to improve the accuracy and efficiency of prostate segmentation in 3D TRUS images, an improved level set method is incorporated into a rotational-slice-based 3D prostate segmentation to decrease the accumulated segmentation errors produced by the slice-by-slice segmentation method. Methods: A 3D image is first resliced into 2D slices in a rotational manner in both the clockwise and counterclockwise directions. All slices intersect approximately along the rotational scanning axis and have an equal angular spacing. Six to eight boundary points are selected to initialize a level set function to extract the prostate contour within the first slice. The segmented contour is then propagated to the adjacent slice and is used as the initial contour for segmentation. This process is repeated until all slices are segmented. A modified distance regularization level set method is used to segment the prostate in all resliced 2D slices. In addition, shape-constraint and local-region-based energies are imposed to discourage the evolved level set function to leak in regions with weak edges or without edges. An anchor point based energy is used to promote the level set function to pass through the initial selected boundary points. The algorithm's performance was evaluated using distance-and volume-based metrics (sensitivity (Se), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean absolute surface distance (MAD), maximum absolute surface distance (MAXD), and volume difference) by comparison with expert delineations. Results: The validation results using thirty 3D patient images showed that the authors' method can obtain a DSC of 93.1% +/- 1.6%, a sensitivity of 93.0% +/- 2.0%, a MAD of 1.18 +/- 0.36 mm, a MAXD of 3.44 +/- 0.8 mm, and a volume difference of 2.6 +/- 1.9 cm(3) for the entire prostate. A reproducibility experiment demonstrated that the proposed method yielded low intraobserver and interobserver variability in terms of DSC. The mean segmentation time of the authors' method for all patient 3D TRUS images was 55 +/- 3.5 s, in addition to 30 +/- 5 s for initialization. Conclusions: To address the challenges involved with slice-based 3D prostate segmentation, a level set based method is proposed in this paper. This method is especially developed for a 3D end-firing TRUS guided prostate biopsy system. The extensive experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method is accurate, robust, and computationally efficient. (C) 2013 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available