Journal
MEDICAL PHYSICS
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 1046-1057Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1118/1.3679012
Keywords
audiovisual biofeedback; 4D PET; motion blurring artifacts; phantom; lung cancer
Funding
- NIH/NCI [R01 93626]
- Stanford Bio-X
- Kwanjeong Educational Foundation (KEF) in Korea
- Kwanjeong Educational Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Purpose: Irregular breathing causes motion blurring artifacts in 4D PET images. Audiovisual (AV) biofeedback has been demonstrated to improve breathing regularity. To investigate the hypothesis that, compared with free breathing, motion blurring artifacts are reduced with AV biofeedback, the authors performed the first experimental phantom-based quantification of the impact of AV biofeedback on 4D PET image quality. Methods: The authors acquired 4D PET dynamic phantom images with AV biofeedback and free breathing by moving a phantom programmed with AV biofeedback trained and free breathing respiratory traces of ten healthy subjects. The authors also acquired stationary phantom images for reference. The phantom was cylindrical with six hollow sphere targets (10, 13, 17, 22, 28, and 37 mm in diameter). The authors quantified motion blurring using the target diameter, Dice coefficient and recovery coefficient (RC) metrics to estimate the effect of motion. Results: The average increase in target diameter for AV biofeedback was 0.6 +/- 1.6 mm (4.7 +/- 13%), which was significantly (p < 0.001) smaller than for free breathing 1.3 +/- 2.2 mm (9.1 +/- 19%). The average Dice coefficient for AV biofeedback was 0.90 +/- 0.07, which was significantly (p < 0.001) larger than for free breathing (0.88 +/- 0.10). The RCs for AV biofeedback were consistently higher than those for free breathing and comparable to those for stationary targets. However, for RCs the impact of target sizes was more dominant than that of motion. In addition, the authors observed large variations in the results with respect to target sizes, subject traces and respiratory bins due to partial volume effects and respiratory motion irregularity. Conclusions: The results indicate that AV biofeedback can significantly reduce motion blurring artifacts and may facilitate improved identification and localization of lung tumors in 4D PET images. The results justify proceeding with clinical studies to quantify the impact of AV biofeedback on 4D PET image quality and tumor detectability. (C) 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3679012]
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available