4.6 Article

A phantom evaluation of Sentinel™, a commercial laser/camera surface imaging system for patient setup verification in radiotherapy

Journal

MEDICAL PHYSICS
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 706-712

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1118/1.3675973

Keywords

surface matching; patient setup; registration; optical system

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate the performance of Sentinel (TM), a patient setup verification device based on a laser/camera system, when used on rigid-body phantoms. Methods: The Sentinel system consists of a scanner unit, containing the laser and the camera, and surface-matching registration software. For the registration procedure, both a computed tomography (CT) and a Sentinel image can be used as a reference. Tests were performed on phantoms using an Elekta Synergy (R) beam modulator Linac equipped with a cone beam CT (CBCT), a HexaPOD RT couch top, and an iViewGT portal imaging system. Experiments conducted in this study tested reproducibility of the Sentinel surface acquisition and of set-up procedure, accuracy in quantifying known phantom mispositioning, and compared Sentinel, CBCT, and portal imaging system performance. Results: Reproducibility of surface acquisition and setup procedure was better than 0.5 mm and 0.5 degrees and 1 mm and 0.4 degrees, respectively. The system accuracy was better than 1 mm and 1 degrees when a Sentinel image was used as reference. A global worsening of Sentinel performance was observed using as reference an external surface extracted from CT study. This effect is probably due to small differences in considered surfaces, caused by different imaging modalities. The results obtained by testing the system on rigid phantoms were comparable to those obtained using CBCT and better than those obtained with conventional portal imaging systems. Conclusions: The Sentinel setup verification device is a reproducible and consistent system able to detect misalignments with accuracy better than 1 mm and 1 degrees. When tested on rigid body phantoms, Sentinel and CBCT performed similarly. When compared to portal imaging, both Sentinel and CBCT were more accurate. (C) 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3675973]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available