4.7 Article

A comparison between rare earth and transition metals working as magnetic materials in an AMR refrigerator in the room temperature range

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 91, Issue -, Pages 767-777

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.08.083

Keywords

Magnetic refrigeration; AMR; Gadolinium; FOMT materials

Funding

  1. University of Salerno

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes a two-dimensional (2D) multiphysics model of a packed bed regenerator made of magnetocaloric material. The regenerator operates as a refrigerant for a magnetic refrigerator operating at room temperature on the strength of an active magnetic regenerator (AMR) cycle. The model is able to simulate the thermofluidodynamic behavior of the magnetocaloric material and the magnetocaloric effect of the refrigerant. The model has been validated by means of experimental results. Different magnetic materials have been tested with the model as refrigerants: pure gadolinium, second order phase magnetic transition Pr0.45Sr0.35MnO3 and first order phase magnetic transition alloys Gd-5(SixGe1-x)(4), LaFe11.384Mn0.356Si1.26H1.52, LaFe11.05Co0.94Si1.10 and MnFeP0.45As0.55. The tests were performed with fixed fluid flow rate (5 1/mm), AMR cycle frequency (1.25 Hz) and cold heat exchanger temperature (288 K) while the hot heat exchanger temperature was varied in the range 295-302 K. The results, generated for a magnetic induction which varies from 0 to 1.5 T, are presented in terms of temperature span, refrigeration power and coefficient of performance. From a global point of view (performances and cost), the most promising materials are LaFeSi compounds which are really cheaper than rare earth compounds and they give a performance sufficiently higher than gadolinium. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available