4.6 Article

In vivo detection and imaging of low-density foreign body with microwave-induced thermoacoustic tomography

Journal

MEDICAL PHYSICS
Volume 36, Issue 8, Pages 3429-3437

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1118/1.3157204

Keywords

acoustic tomography; biomedical ultrasonics; phantoms; thermoacoustics

Funding

  1. Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT0829]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30627003, 30870676]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [7117865]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Radiography or computed tomography is the most widely available imaging tool for foreign body detection. However, the detectability of low-density substances by x ray is very poor when located in soft tissues. Various dielectric loss factors of foreign bodies contribute great microwave absorption heterogeneity compared with the surrounding tissue. A fast thermoacoustic tomography system at 1.2 and 6 GHz was developed to detect foreign targets in small animals. The 6 GHz system had a much higher signal-to-noise ratio in near-surface imaging but smaller imaging depth than the 1.2 GHz system. The effects of microwave distribution inhomogeneity on nonuniform excitation of acoustic pressure were studied and a corresponding calibration algorithm for image distortion was provided and experimentally examined. Thermoacoustic images of radiolucent objects including glass fiber, wood, and bamboo hidden in phantom and residual in living mice were compared with radiography and ultrasonography. Good contrast was obtained between the foreign bodies and the tissue surrounding it, and the location and size of the lesion targets in thermoacoustic images were in good agreement with the actual sample. The experimental results demonstrate that thermoacoustic tomography may become the ideal modality for radiolucent foreign body detection and imaging in animals and human.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available