4.4 Article

Detection of miR-34a and miR-34b/c in stool sample as potential screening biomarkers for noninvasive diagnosis of colorectal cancer

Journal

MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-014-0894-7

Keywords

Methylation; miR-34a; miR-34b/c; Stool DNA; CRC; Biomarker

Categories

Funding

  1. Scientific and Technologic Bureau of Xi'an

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Explore potential screening biomarkers for noninvasive diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) by testing methylation of the miR-34a and miR- 34b/c promoter in CRC patients' tissue and stool samples. Methylation- specific PCR analyses were performed on sample DNAs: 82 pairs of normal/ cancer samples, 82 CRC patients' stool samples, 40 healthy volunteer stool samples, and 20 healthy volunteer blood samples were recruited. miR-34a has been found methylated in 65 of 82 (79.3 %) the CRC tissue samples, but only 36 of 82 (43.9 %) in corresponding normal samples. And when testing miR- 34a in stool, 63 of 82 (76.8 %) CRC stool samples were observed methylated, and 2 of 40 (5 %) healthy samples were observed methylated. The methylation for miR- 34b/ c has been found in 80 of 82 (97.5 %) CRC tissue samples, 49 of 82 (59.8 %) corresponding CRC normal samples, and 74 of 79 (93.6 %) CRC stool samples. Yet we did not detect any methylation from healthy volunteers stool samples or healthy adult blood samples. Results indicated 76.8 % sensitivity and 93.6 % specificity of the miR- 34a methylation test for detecting CRC using stool samples. Meanwhile, the sensitivity and specificity of miR-34b/ c were 95 and 100 %, respectively. Moreover, our results revealed that abnormal DNA methylation of miR-34a was correlated with lymph metastasis (P = 0.010). Abnormal methylation of miR- 34a and miR- 34b/ c genes might be regarded as potential biomarkers for noninvasive screening and diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available