4.4 Review

Circulating endothelial progenitor cell: a promising biomarker in clinical oncology

Journal

MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-014-0332-x

Keywords

Endothelial progenitor cells; Cancer; Vascularization; Biomarker

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81070597, 81370853]
  2. Science and Education Development Program of the Jiangsu Province Health Board [LJ201107]
  3. Six Talent Peaks of the Jiangsu Province Health Bureau [2011-WS-093]
  4. Research and Innovation Program for Graduates of Jiangsu Province [CXZZ13_0583]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human cancers are endowed with sustained vascularization capability, and their growth, invasion, and metastasis are vascularization dependent. Recently, accumulated body of evidence suggests that endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) can support vasculogenesis and induce angiogenesis through paracrine mechanisms. In addition, numerous clinical studies have revealed the increase in the number of EPCs in the peripheral blood of cancer patients and demonstrated the correlation of circulating EPCs (CEPCs) with the clinical outcomes. This review highlights current enrichment procedures and methods for the detection of CEPCs and different biomarkers to identify CEPCs as well as the functions of EPCs in tumor vascularization. Furthermore, we systematically review available studies on the clinical relevance of CEPCs in cancer patients to explore the potential diagnostic and prognostic values of CEPCs. Although several contrasting results exist, CEPCs can conceivably serve as a promising biomarker for the early diagnosis, prognosis prediction, and treatment response indication in the future. Additionally, further well-designed clinical studies with larger sample size and unique, specific enumeration procedures are warranted to achieve further insight into the clinical implications of CEPCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available