4.4 Article

High expression of S100A11 in pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an unfavorable prognostic marker

Journal

MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 1886-1891

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-011-0058-y

Keywords

Pancreatic carcinoma; S100A11; Prognostic factor; Immunohistochemical analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. Foundation for Talents in Six Fields of Jiangsu Province [2006073]
  2. Health Project of Jiangsu Province [H200923]
  3. Social Development Foundation of Nantong City [S2007028, S2010012]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

S100A11 is a member of S100 protein family, and our previous study showed that S100A11 is one of the up-regulated proteins that have not been reported to be associated with pancreatic carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relation between S100A11 expression and the clinicopathological variables and clinical outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry analysis was performed for S100A11 in 78 pairs of specimens of human pancreatic adenocarcinoma tissues and adjacent nontumorous tissues. The univariate and multivariate survival analyses were also performed to determine its prognostic significance. S100A11 expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (62/78) was significantly higher than that in the adjacent nontumorous tissues (19/78) (P = 0.000). High expression of S100A11 was associated with the lymph node metastasis and histological differentiation (P = 0.003 and 0.004, respectively). Univariate analysis showed that S100A11 expression was associated with poor prognosis (P = 0.0000). Multivariate analysis using the Cox regression model indicated that age >= 65 years, CA19-9 >= 1,000 U/ml and positive S100A11 were independent prognostic indicators of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (P = 0.002, 0.004 and 0.001, respectively). These results suggested that S100A11 might be a significant tumor marker for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and an unfavorable predictor for prognosis of patients who have undergone surgical resection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available