4.4 Article

Immunohistochemical detection of HSP27 and hnRNP K as prognostic and predictive biomarkers for colorectal cancer

Journal

MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 1780-1788

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-011-0037-3

Keywords

Colorectal cancer; Immunohistochemistry; Tissue microarray; Prognosis; Heat shock protein 27 (HSP27); Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K (hnRNP K)

Categories

Funding

  1. Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine [BXJ201137]
  2. Major Basic Research Program of Shanghai [07DZ19505]
  3. National 973 Basic Research Program of China [2008CB517403]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study was aimed at evaluating the expression of heat shock protein 27 (HSP27) and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K (hnRNP K), two potential biomarkers of many cancers, in colorectal cancer (CRC) and their clinical significance. Expression of HSP27 and hnRNP K were investigated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a series of tissue microarrays containing 175 primary colorectal cancers and their corresponding normal mucosa samples and matched with clinicopathological features and patient survival. HSP27 and hnRNP K displayed more frequent strong immunoreactivity in primary colorectal tumor samples compared with adjacent noncancer tissue (P<0.001). Increased cytoplasmic expression of HSP27 and hnRNP K were associated with tumor location (P = 0.032 and P<0.001, respectively), poorer overall survival (P = 0.004 and P = 0.02, respectively) and to an unfavorable prognosis for CRC patients in multivariate analysis (P = 0.019 and P = 0.01, respectively). Their overexpression combination identified a subset of patients with definitively worse prognosis than any other combination (P<0.001). Overexpression of HSP27 and hnRNPK were independent markers of poor prognosis, and their combination predicted definitively adverse outcomes in CRC patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available