4.4 Article

Expression and significance of Cx43 and E-cadherin in gastric cancer and metastatic lymph nodes

Journal

MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 502-508

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-010-9492-5

Keywords

Gastric cancer; Cx43; Metastasis; Gap junction; E-cadherin; Lymph nodes

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30801097]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Connexin 43(Cx43) and E-cadherin are concurrently expressed in many tumors and were ever classified as tumor suppressors in primary tumors (PT), whereas recent studies showed that these two proteins played specific roles in tumor metastasis. The aim of our study is to determine the expression of Cx43 and E-cadherin in primary gastric tumors (PTs) and matched metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) and to explore the clinical and pathological implications of expression of these proteins. Immunohistochemical assay was conducted to detect the expression of Cx43 and E-cadherin in PTs and MLNs, and the clinical and pathological implications were analyzed by statistical methods. In PTs, the expression of Cx43 and E-cadherin was significantly reduced, compared to adjacent normal tissues (P < 0.01). The expression of Cx43 and E-cadherin was significantly increased in MLNs compared with PTs (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, for Cx43 and E-cadherin, respectively), and some Cx43 and E-cadherin-negative PTs developed Cx43 and E-cadherin-positive MLNs. Furthermore, reduced expression of both Cx43 and E-cadherin significantly correlated with poor differentiation, advanced TNM stage, and lymph note metastasis of gastric cancers. Cx43 and E-cadherin expression significantly correlated with each other. We concluded that concurrent reduction in Cx43 and E-cadherin may contribute to the occurrence of gastric cancer. However, concurrent increased expression of Cx43 and E-cadherin may contribute to the efficient metastasis of gastric cancer to the lymph nodes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available