4.5 Article

Galectin-3 plays an important role in protection against disseminated candidiasis

Journal

MEDICAL MYCOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 6, Pages 641-651

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3109/13693786.2013.770607

Keywords

Galectin-3; Candida albicans; Candida parapsilosis; candidiasis; neonate

Funding

  1. National Center for Research Resources [5P20RR018728-10]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences from the National Institutes of Health [8P20GM103537-10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent in vitro studies have implicated galectin-3 as an important receptor in host recognition and response to specific Candida species; however, its role in protection against disseminated candidiasis in vivo has not been evaluated. This study investigated the importance of galectin-3 in host defense against systemic infection with the highly virulent species Candida albicans, and the less virulent species, C. parapsilosis. Mice deficient in galectin-3 (gal3(-/-)) were more susceptible to infection than wild-type (WT) mice. When infected with C. albicans, gal3(-/-) mice died significantly faster and exhibited a trend towards increased fungal burden and increased abscess formation in infected brains compared to WT mice. When infected with C. parapsilosis, gal3(-/-) mice had significantly higher renal fungal burdens and abscess formation compared to WT mice. To evaluate whether galectin-3 may contribute to susceptibility to candidiasis in human infants, galectin-3 levels in sera of newborn infants, a patient population uniquely susceptible to infections with both C. albicans and C. parapsilosis, were compared to serum galectin-3 levels of adults. Galectin-3 levels were significantly lower in newborn infant sera compared to adult sera. These data indicate that galectin-3 plays an important role in a murine model of disseminated candidiasis and suggest a potential mechanism of neonatal susceptibility to these infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available