4.5 Article

Multicenter surveillance of species distribution and antifungal susceptibilities of Candida bloodstream isolates in South Korea

Journal

MEDICAL MYCOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 669-674

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3109/13693780903410386

Keywords

Candida; antifungal susceptibility; candidemia; azoles; echinocandins

Funding

  1. IISP of MSD Korea [CCD-MSG-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multicenter data on in vitro susceptibility of Candida bloodstream isolates to echinocandin antifungal agents is still lacking in South Korea. We performed a prospective multicenter study to determine the species distribution of Candida bloodstream isolates and their susceptibility to five antifungal agents, including caspofungin and micafungin. A total of 639 isolates were collected from 20 tertiary hospitals between September 2006 and August 2007. Antifungal susceptibilities were determined through the use of the CLSI broth microdilution method M27-A3. The overall species distribution was as follows; Candida albicans (38%), Candida parapsilosis (26%), Candia tropicalis (20%), Candida glabrata (11%), and miscellaneous Candida species (5%). Although C. parapsilosis and miscellaneous Candida species were less susceptible to both echinocandins, all 639 isolates were susceptible to both caspofungin and micafungin (MIC, <= 2 mu g/ml). Nearly all isolates (99.7%) had a MIC <= 1 mu g/ml to amphotericin B. Resistance to fluconazole and voriconazole was found in 0.8% and 0.3%, respectively, among all Candida isolates, with C. glabrata and C. krusei isolates displaying the greatest level of resistance. This is the largest multicenter candidemia study conducted in South Korea and shows that non-C. albicans Candida species, including C. parapsilosis, constitutes over 60% of all Candida species isolates recovered from the bloodstream. In addition, the rates of resistance to all five antifungals, including two echinocandins, are still low among bloodstream isolates in South Korea.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available