4.7 Article

Unsupervised 4D myocardium segmentation with a Markov Random Field based deformable model

Journal

MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 283-301

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2011.01.002

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging; Markov Random Field; Unsupervised segmentation; Cardiac function; Acute myocardial infarction

Funding

  1. Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias [PI04-1483]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion
  3. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) [TEC2007-67073/TCM]
  4. Centro para el Desarrollo Tecnologico Industrial (CDTI) [CEN-20091044]
  5. Junta de Castilla y Leon [VA027A07, VA039A10-2]
  6. Consejeria de Sanidad de Castilla y Leon [GRS 292/A/08, SAN126/VA032/09, SAN126/VA033/09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A stochastic deformable model is proposed for the segmentation of the myocardium in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The segmentation is posed as a probabilistic optimization problem in which the optimal time-dependent surface is obtained for the myocardium of the heart in a discrete space of locations built upon simple geometric assumptions. For this purpose, first, the left ventricle is detected by a set of image analysis tools gathered from the literature. Then, the segmentation solution is obtained by the Maximization of the Posterior Marginals for the myocardium location in a Markov Random Field framework which optimally integrates temporal-spatial smoothness with intensity and gradient related features in an unsupervised way by the Maximum Likelihood estimation of the parameters of the field. This scheme provides a flexible and robust segmentation method which has been able to generate results comparable to manually segmented images for some derived cardiac function parameters in a set of 43 patients affected in different degrees by an Acute Myocardial Infarction. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available