4.4 Article

Hemodynamics in the cephalic arch of a brachiocephalic fistula

Journal

MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS
Volume 36, Issue 7, Pages 822-830

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.03.001

Keywords

Brachiocephalic; Fistula; Cephalic arch; Intimal hyperplasia; Stenosis

Funding

  1. National Institute Of Diabetes And Digestive And Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [R01DK090769]
  2. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1030347] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The care and outcome of patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) on chronic hemodialysis is directly dependent on their hemodialysis access. A brachiocephalic fistula (BCF) is commonly placed in the elderly and in patients with a failed lower-arm, or radiocephalic, fistula. However, there are numerous complications such that the BCF has an average patency of only 3.6 years. A leading cause of BCF dysfunction and failure is stenosis in the arch of the cephalic vein near its junction with the axillary vein, which is called cephalic arch stenosis (CAS). Using a combined clinical and computational investigation, we seek to improve our understanding of the cause of CAS, and to develop a means of predicting CAS risk in patients with a planned BCF access. This paper details the methodology used to determine the hemodynamic consequences of the post-fistula environment and illustrates detailed results for a representative sample of patient-specific anatomies, including a single, bifurcated, and trifurcated arch. It is found that the high flows present due to fistula creation lead to secondary flows in the arch owing to its curvature with corresponding low wall shear stresses. The abnormally low wall shear stress locations correlate with the development of stenosis in the singular case that is tracked in time for a period of one year. (C) 2014 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available