4.4 Article

Development and validation of a computer crash simulation model of an occupied adult manual wheelchair subjected to a frontal impact

Journal

MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 272-279

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.01.008

Keywords

Wheelchair transportation safety; ANSI/RESNA WC19; Computer crash simulation model; MADMYO

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health (NIH) [1R41HD047105-01]
  2. University of Louisville

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wheelchairs are primarily designed for mobility and are not necessarily intended for use as motor vehicle seats. However, many wheelchairs serve as vehicle seats for individuals unable to transfer to a vehicle seat. Subjecting wheelchairs to sled testing, in part establishes the crashworthiness of wheelchairs used as motor vehicle seats. Computer simulations provide a supplemental approach for sled testing, to assess wheelchair response and loading under crash conditions. In this study a nonlinear, dynamic, computer model was developed and validated to simulate a wheelchair and occupant subjected to a frontal impact test (ANSI/RESNA WC19). This simulation model was developed utilizing data from two frontal impact 20g/48 km/h sled tests, which consisted of identical, adult manual wheelchairs secured with 4-point tiedowns, occupied with a 50th percentile adult male anthropomorphic test device (ATD), restrained with a 3-point occupant restraint system. Additionally, the model was validated against sled data using visual comparisons of wheelchair and occupant kinematics, along with statistical assessments of outcome measures. All statistical evaluations were found to be within the acceptance criteria, indicating the model's high predictability of the sled tests. This model provides a useful tool for the development of crashworthy wheelchair design guidelines, as well as the development of transit-safe wheelchair technologies. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IPEM

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available