4.4 Article

Electronic Health Records to Coordinate Decision Making for Complex Patients: What Can We Learn from Wiki?

Journal

MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 722-731

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10385846

Keywords

decision making; communication; electronic health records; disease management; reviews; quality and safety

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [K23CA125585] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [K23AG027144] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Processes of communication that guide decision making among clinicians collaboratively caring for complex patients are poorly understood and vary based on local contexts. In this paper, the authors characterize these processes and propose a wiki-style communication model to improve coordination of decision making among clinicians using an integrated electronic health record (EHR). Methods. A narrative review of current patterns of communication among clinicians sharing medical decisions focusing on the emerging and potential roles of EHRs to enhance communication among clinicians caring for complex patients. Results. The authors present the taxonomy of decision making and communication among clinicians caring for complex patients. They then adapt wiki-style communication to propose a novel model of communication among clinicians for decision making within multidisciplinary disease management programs. Future innovations using wiki-style communication among clinicians are also described and placed in the context of medical decisions by clinicians working together in disease management programs. Conclusions. EHR-based wiki-style applications may have the potential to improve communication and care coordination among clinicians caring for complex patients. This could lead to improved quality and safety within multidisciplinary disease management programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available