Journal
MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW
Volume 70, Issue 5, Pages 542-563Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1077558713487771
Keywords
geographic variations; Medicare costs; casemix adjustment; risk adjustment
Funding
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, through Health Care Financing and Organization (HCFO) program [64006]
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- National Institute on Aging [1RO1 AG027312-01A2]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Control for area differences in population health (casemix adjustment) is necessary to measure geographic variations in medical spending. Studies use various casemix adjustment methods, resulting in very different geographic variation estimates. We study casemix adjustment methodological issues and evaluate alternative approaches using claims from 1.6 million Medicare beneficiaries in 60 representative communities. Two key casemix adjustment methodscontrolling for patient conditions obtained from diagnoses on claims and expenditures of those at the end of lifewere evaluated. We failed to find evidence of bias in the former approach attributable to area differences in physician diagnostic patterns, as others have found, and found that the assumption underpinning the latter approachthat persons close to death are equally sick across areascannot be supported. Diagnosis-based approaches are more appropriate when current rather than prior year diagnoses are used. Population health likely explains more than 75% to 85% of cost variations across fixed sets of areas.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available