4.1 Article

Improving the Effectiveness of Health Care Innovation Implementation: Middle Managers as Change Agents

Journal

MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW
Volume 70, Issue 1, Pages 29-45

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1077558712457427

Keywords

middle managers; implementation effectiveness; innovation; quality improvement; health centers

Funding

  1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [R36HS019107]
  2. Health Resources and Services Administration [U01 HS13635]
  3. National Cancer Institute [5 R25 CA57726]
  4. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [K24 DK071933]
  5. Diabetes Research and Training Center [P60 DK20595]
  6. Chicago Center for Diabetes Translation Research [P30 DK092949]
  7. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Chicago Center for Diabetes Translation Research [P30 DK092949]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rate of successful health care innovation implementation is dismal. Middle managers have a potentially important yet poorly understood role in health care innovation implementation. This study used self-administered surveys and interviews of middle managers in health centers that implemented an innovation to reduce health disparities to address the questions: Does middle managers' commitment to health care innovation implementation influence implementation effectiveness? If so, in what ways does their commitment influence implementation effectiveness? Although quantitative survey data analysis results suggest a weak relationship, qualitative interview data analysis results indicate that middle managers' commitment influences implementation effectiveness when middle managers are proactive. Scholars should account for middle managers' influence in implementation research, and health care executives may promote implementation effectiveness by hiring proactive middle managers and creating climates in which proactivity is rewarded, supported, and expected.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available