4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Confounding Control in Healthcare Database Research Challenges and Potential Approaches

Journal

MEDICAL CARE
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages S114-S120

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181dbebe3

Keywords

confounding; unmeasured confounding; propensity scores; variable selection; pharmacoepidemiology

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [K25-AG027400, R01 AG018833, K25 AG027400, R01 AG023178, R01-AG023178, R01-AG18833] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NLM NIH HHS [R01-LM010213, R01 LM010213] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epidemiologic studies are increasingly used to investigate the safety and effectiveness of medical products and interventions. Appropriate adjustment for confounding in such studies is challenging because exposure is determined by a complex interaction of patient, physician, and healthcare system factors. The challenges of confounding control are particularly acute in studies using healthcare utilization databases where information on many potential confounding factors is lacking and the meaning of variables is often unclear. We discuss advantages and disadvantages of different approaches to confounder control in healthcare databases. In settings where considerable uncertainty surrounds the data or the causal mechanisms underlying the treatment assignment and outcome process, we suggest that researchers report a panel of results under various specifications of statistical models. Such reporting allows the reader to assess the sensitivity of the results to model assumptions that are often not supported by strong subject-matter knowledge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available