4.4 Article

An assessment of the quality of mammography care at facilities treating medically vulnerable populations

Journal

MEDICAL CARE
Volume 46, Issue 7, Pages 701-708

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181789329

Keywords

mammography; screening; quality of care; vulnerable populations

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [K24 CA125036, U01 CA086076, U01 CA063731, K07 CA086032, U01 CA086076-07, U01CA70013, U01CA63740, U01CA70040, U01CA86082, U01CA63736, U01 CA086082, U01 CA063740, U01CA69976, U01 CA070040, U01 CA086076-06, U01 CA069976, U01CA86076, U01 CA063736, U01 CA070013, K07 CA086032-04, U01CA63731] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Women in medically vulnerable populations, including racial and ethnic minorities, socioeconomically disadvantaged, and residents of rural areas, experience higher breast cancer mortality than do others. Whether mammography facilities that treat vulnerable women demonstrate lower quality of care than other facilities is unknown. Objectives: To assess the quality of mammography women receive at facilities characterized as serving a high proportion of medically vulnerable populations. Research Design: We prospectively collected self-reported breast cancer risk factor information, mammography interpretations, and cancer outcomes on 1,579,929 screening mammography examinations from 750,857 women, aged 40-80 years, attending any of 151 facilities in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium between 1998 and 2004. To classify facilities as serving medically vulnerable populations, we used 4 criteria: educational attainment, racial/ethnic minority, household income, and rural/urban residence. Results: After adjustment for patient-level factors known to affect mammography accuracy, facilities serving vulnerable populations had significantly higher mammography specificity than did other facilities: ie, those serving a higher proportion of women who were minorities [odds ratio (OR): 1.32; 95% confidence interval (Cl): 1.01-1.73], living in rural areas (1.45; 1.15-1.73), and with lower household income (1.33; 1.05-1.68). We observed no statistically significant differences between facilities in mammography sensitivity. Conclusions: Facilities serving high proportions of vulnerable populations provide screening mammography with equal or better quality (as reflected in higher specificity with no corresponding decrease in sensitivity) than other facilities. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying these findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available