4.2 Article

Foci report on indigenous Dermacentor reticulatus populations in Belgium and a preliminary study of associated babesiosis pathogens

Journal

MEDICAL AND VETERINARY ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 355-358

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2011.00998.x

Keywords

Dermacentor reticulatus; Babesia spp; tick; Belgium

Funding

  1. Belgian Ministry of Defence [WB28]
  2. Bayer Health Care, Diegem, Belgium
  3. POSTICK ITN (Postgraduate Training Network for Capacity Building to Control Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases) within the FP7-PEOPLE-ITN programme (EU) [238511]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The occurrence of autochthonous clinical cases of canine and equine babesiosis in Belgium during the last two decades suggests that the vector of the pathogens responsible for these diseases, Dermacentor reticulatus (Ixodida: Ixodidae), may be present in this country. Consequently, evidence for the presence of this tick species in different locations within Belgium was investigated. Four different locations were monitored by flagging in 2010; these included the locations at which D. reticulatus was previously found on a dog in 2009 and on two red deer in 2007. Two different species of tick were identified, Ixodes ricinus (Ixodida: Ixodidae) and D. reticulatus. A total of 282 D. reticulatus adult ticks (98 males, 184 females) were collected from the four sites. Ticks were found mainly from early March until the end of May and a peak in activity was apparent in March. A Babesia spp. (Piroplasmida: Babesiidae) genus-specific polymerase chain reaction test based on the amplification of a fragment of the 18S rRNA gene was used to investigate the potential presence of Babesia spp. All DNA extracts isolated from the total tick samples yielded negative results. Additional studies to accurately determine the distribution and vectorial capacity of this important tick species in Belgium are warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available